|
|
|
|
| THE
IMPACT OF LEASED EMPLOYEES ON RETIREMENT PLAN OPERATION |
|
 |
|
The Leased Employee rules are very complex
and the appropriate operation of the plan may vary widely
based on the specifics of the Leased Employee situation.
The first step in the process is to determine whether
any employees are "Leased Employees" as that
term is defined by the IRS. In order to meet that definition,
the employees must be performing services for the client
company for a fee, they must be common law employees
of the leasing company and not of the client company
(more on this below), they must provide services for
the client company on a substantially full time basis
for at least a year, and they must be under the primary
direction or control of the recipient. If these requirements
are not met, the employees must be completely disregarded
for all retirement plan purposes.
|
|
 |
|
If the employees do meet the Leased
Employee definition, they must either be considered
for retirement plan purposes under the client company's
plan or under a certain safe harbor plan sponsored by
the leasing company. This safe harbor plan must be a
money purchase plan with immediate participation and
a contribution of at least 10% of compensation. This
contribution must be 100% vested immediately. In addition,
Leased Employees may not make up more than 20% of the
company's workforce. If the leasing company does not
provide a safe harbor plan or if Leased Employees make
up more than 20% of the workforce, the client company
must consider these Leased Employees for all plan purposes.
It is still possible to exclude Leased Employees from
participation in the plan as long as the plan is able
to pass a required coverage test. In general, the coverage
test requires the percentage of Non-Highly Compensated
Employees benefiting under the plan to be at least 70%
of percentage of Highly Compensated Employees benefiting
under the plan. If the company employs a large percentage
of Leased Employees, it will be difficult if not impossible
to pass this test. However, any contributions or benefits
provided under the leasing company's retirement plan
that can be attributed to services performed for the
client company can be included by the client company
for all required testing. Therefore, it may be possible
to exclude the Leased Employees from the client company's
plan and pass the required annual testing if the Leased
Employees participate in a plan sponsored by the leasing
company.
|
|
 |
|
As part of determining whether employees
meet the Leased Employee definition, it is necessary
to take a very close look at who is the common law employer
- the leasing company or the client company. Numerous
court cases have found that Leased Employees may in
fact be common law employees of the client company despite
the leasing arrangement. This is determined on a facts
and circumstances basis. If the employees are determined
to be common law employees of the client company, they
should be treated the same as all non-Leased Employees
for qualified plan purposes. Some of the items considered
by the courts when deciding who is the common law employer
include who has primary direction or control of the
employee's services, the right to hire or fire the employee,
who determines the method, order or sequence of the
duties to be performed, and who supervises the employee.
These items are reviewed in operation, regardless of
the terms of the leasing agreement. These items are
very similar to those used to determine if the employees
are under the primary direction or control of the client
company, which further serves to complicate the matter.
Leased Employees are most frequently found to be common
law employees of the client when a company's entire
workforce is coordinated through a Professional Employer
Group. Owners and other Highly Compensated Employees
are rarely accepted as common law employees of the leasing
company. A company can apply to the IRS for a determination
of common law employee status.
|
|
 |
|
If the Leased Employees are determined
to be common law employees of the client company and
not the leasing company, the leasing company's plan
could be disqualified for covering individuals who are
not employees of the plan sponsor as this violates the
exclusive benefit rule of ERISA. Many professional employer
organizations and leasing companies with long term contract
employees expect the client company to become a participating
sponsor in the leasing company's plan to avoid this
potential defect.
|
 |
This article provides an overview of the Leased Employee regulations. If you wish to discuss how these rules apply to your plan, or if you are considering adding Leased Employees to your workforce, please contact us at (843) 884-3912 to discuss the specifics of your organization. |
 |
|
|
|
|